The Role of Mediation in Land Dispute Resolution: Effectiveness and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v4i2.157Keywords:
Role, Mediation, Land Dispute, Effectives, Challenges, IndonesiaAbstract
Land disputes are one of the most common types of conflict in Indonesia, given that land has a very high economic, social and cultural value. As development and land use changes increase, disputes over ownership, boundaries, and land use rights are increasingly common. Mediation as an alternative to out-of-court dispute resolution has been recognised as a faster, cheaper and more efficient method of resolving often complex and sensitive land conflicts. This study analyses the various factors that influence the success of mediation in land dispute cases, including the role of the mediator, legal support, as well as the readiness of the parties involved. The results show that mediation can be an effective tool for resolving land disputes, especially when supported by competent mediators and a strong desire from the parties to reach an agreement. However, the research also identified a number of challenges, such as the power imbalance between the parties, the lack of understanding of the mediation process, as well as limitations in the implementation of mediation outcomes. Thus, while mediation offers great potential in land dispute resolution, further efforts are needed to overcome these obstacles in order for mediation to function optimally in the context of agrarian law in Indonesia.Downloads
References
Arstein-Kerslake, A., & Black, J. (2020). Right to legal capacity in therapeutic jurisprudence: Insights from critical disability theory and the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 68, 101535.
Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law.
Cooke, E. (2003). The new law of land registration. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
Goldfinch, S. (1998). Remaking New Zealand’s Economic Policy: institutional elites as radical innovators 1984–1993. Governance, 11(2), 177–207.
Knoke, D. (1993). Explaining public policy-making. Sociology and the Public Agenda, 8, 164.
Larson, D. A. (2014). Access to justice for persons with disabilities: An emerging strategy. Laws, 3(2), 220–238.
Lines, R. (2008). The right to health of prisoners in international humanrights law. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 4(1), 3–53.
Schulman, P. R. (1988). The Politics of" Ideational Policy". The Journal of Politics, 50(2), 263–291.
Schutter, O. De. (2014). The Reform of the Committee on World Food Security: The Quest for Coherence in Global Governance. In N. C. S. Lambek, P. Claeys, A. Wong, & L. Brilmayer (Eds.), Rethinking Food Systems: Structural Challenges, New Strategies and the Law (pp. 219–238). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7778-1_10
Weatherspoon, D. D., Steele-Adjognon, M., Niyitanga, F., Dushimumuremyi, J. P., Naseem, A., & Oehmke, J. (2017). Food expenditure patterns, preferences, policy, and access of Rwandan households. British Food Journal, 119(6), 1202–1215. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2016-0408
Yusriadi, Y., Kurniawaty, Sibali, A., & Mattalatta. (2023). Poverty Policy: Between Hope and Reality. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 3(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v3i2.120
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jumra, Tarmizi, Mukhawas Rasyid, Suriati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors should sign copyright transfer agreement when they have approved the final proofs sent by JISSR prior to the publication