Working Environment and Position to Employee Performance Improvement

Authors

  • Surakhmat Student of Doctoral Program at Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMKOP,
  • Ansar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMKOP
  • Kurniawaty Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi AMKOP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v3i1.57

Keywords:

environment, position, employee, performance, Indoensia

Abstract

Work performance is the work achieved by a person in carrying out the tasks assigned to him based on skills, experience, sincerity, and time. A comfortable work environment, friendly and mutually supportive co-workers, and caring leaders will provide positive motivation at work. Employees will work for hand in hand with joy. Healthy competition in organizations or agencies. This study uses library research to examine the improvement of employee performance. The study results show that performance is what employees do, so it affects how much they contribute to the agency or organization, including the quality of services provided. Organizations in improving employee performance need the development of appropriate human resources with a supportive work environment. Factors used to enhance employee performance include individual abilities (knowledge, skills), the effort devoted, and organizational support. Employee performance is the result of the thought and energy of an employee on the work done, it can be tangible, seen, and counted in number, but in many cases, the results of thought and energy cannot be trusted and seen, such as ideas and innovations from employees to improve organizational progress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alban Singirankabo, U., & Willem Ertsen, M. (2020). Relations between land tenure security and agricultural productivity: Exploring the effect of land registration. Land, 9(5), 138.

Ayano, M. F. (2018). Rural land registration in Ethiopia: Myths and realities. Law & Society Review, 52(4), 1060–1097.

Capriotti, P., & Kuklinski, H. P. (2012). Assessing dialogic communication through the Internet in Spanish museums. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 619–626.

Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2009). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 233–266.

Gelderman, C. J., Semeijn, J., & Mertschuweit, P. P. (2016). The impact of social capital and technological uncertainty on strategic performance: The supplier perspective. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(3), 225–234.

Gregory, G. D., Ngo, L. V., & Karavdic, M. (2019). Developing e-commerce marketing capabilities and efficiencies for enhanced performance in business-to-business export ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 146–157.

Kehinde, A. D., Adeyemo, R., & Ogundeji, A. A. (2021). Does social capital improve farm productivity and food security? Evidence from cocoa-based farming households in Southwestern Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(3), e06592.

Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.021

Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124.

Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(3–4), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726218

Serrat, O. (2017). The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach BT - Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance (O. Serrat, Ed.; pp. 21–26). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5

Tamsah, H., Yusriadi, Y., & Farida, U. (2020). Training, knowledge sharing, and quality of work-life on civil servants performance in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(3), 163–176.

Yusriadi, Y. (2018a). Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang dan Hambatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik: Public Administration Journal, 8(2), 178–185.

Yusriadi, Y. (2018b). Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang dan Hambatan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik: Public Administration Journal, 8(2), 178–185.

Yusriadi, Y. (2019). Public Health Services: BPJS Case Study in Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik: Public Administration Journal, 9(2), 85–91.

Yusriadi, Y., & Cahaya, A. (2022). Food security systems in rural communities: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.987853

Yusriadi, Y., & Farida, U. (2019). Bureaucracy Performance in Public Services in Indonesia. Jurnal Administrare: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah Dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 6(1), 17–24.

Zacharias, T., Rahawarin, M. A., & Yusriadi, Y. (2021). Cultural reconstruction and organization environment for employee performance. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 296–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/801

Zevenbergen, J. (2002). Systems of land registration aspects and effects. Publications on Geodesy, 51.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-23

How to Cite

Surakhmat, Ansar, & Kurniawaty. (2023). Working Environment and Position to Employee Performance Improvement. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 3(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v3i1.57

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)