Decision Disparity in Narcotics Abuse

Authors

  • Jumra Univaersitas Andi Sudirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v3i1.108

Keywords:

decision, disparity, narcotics, abuse, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors that cause the disparity of decisions in narcotics abuse, as well as how to overcome it. The development of narcotics abuse and trafficking that has hit the world has also affected the country, its development is so rapid that it is very worrying. Indonesia's vast territory and consists of 17 thousand islands in addition to Indonesia's large population of around 250 million, for the narcotics market is an extraordinarily promising market. this is what attracts foreign narcotics mafia to invade Indonesia in various ways. the type of data is primary data and secondary data, primary data obtained through direct interviews with competent respondents. Secondary data is obtained through literature from various books, legal rules, documents, and other written data that are considered related to this research. The results showed that 1) Factors that cause disparity include subjective factors in making decisions as well as aggravating and mitigating factors; 2) Efforts to overcome the disparity in narcotics abuse decisions are to conduct personality development training, in order to be able to demonstrate professionalism and integrity to pay attention to the case at hand, so as to be able to make policies that provide a sense of justice for every community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adriel, K., Winata, T., Rossellini, R. A. S., & Neltje, J. (2023). The Legal Politics of Regulating Indigenous Peoples. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 1(1), 9–14.

Bonham, V. L. (2001). Race, ethnicity, and pain treatment: Striving to understand the causes and solutions to the disparities in pain treatment. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29(1), 52–68.

Burgess, D. J., Crowley-Matoka, M., Phelan, S., Dovidio, J. F., Kerns, R., Roth, C., Saha, S., & van Ryn, M. (2008). Patient race and physicians’ decisions to prescribe opioids for chronic low back pain. Social Science & Medicine, 67(11), 1852–1860.

Dewi Anggraeny, K. (n.d.). Disparities In The Judge’s Decision On Narcotic Crime. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 52.

Hartley, R. D., Kwak, D.-H., Park, M., & Lee, M.-S. (2010). International Journal of Offender.

Hartley, R. D., Kwak, D.-H., Park, M., & Lee, M.-S. (2011). Exploring sex disparity in sentencing outcomes: A focus on narcotics offenders in South Korea. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 268–286.

Hartley, R. D., Testa, A., & Martinez, E. (2021). Race, ethnicity, and punishment for federal sex offenses: Changing composition in child pornography and sex abuse cases and temporal disparity in sentencing over time. Sexual Abuse, 33(8), 891–922.

Haryanto, I. K., Sudarsono, S., Sugiri, B., & Budiono, A. R. (2021). Ratio legis of special minimum limit regulation in narcotics law. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(7), 423–431.

Hidayatulloh, A., Guilin, X., Jiao, D., & Wang, Y. (2023). Analysis of Judgment Conditions in Making a Decision for Rehabilitation of Persons of Criminal Actions Based on Narcotics ABUSE Decision Number: 302/PID. SUS/2022/PN. TJK and Decision Number 217/PID. SUS/2022/PN. KLA. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 1(1), 42–47.

Irmawan, D. D., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2018). Disparities Criminal Case Against Judge’s Decision In Crime Of Narcotics Abuse Viewed From The Purpose Of Criminal Law. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 973–980.

Kahn, N. E., & Hansen, M. E. (2017). Measuring racial disparities in foster care placement: A case study of Texas. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 213–226.

Liang, B., Lu, H., & Taylor, M. (2009). Female drug abusers, narcotics offenders, and legal punishment in China. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2), 133–141.

Prasetya, M. D., Sari, I. P., Said, S., & Akbar, A. (2022). Forms and Developments of Narcotics Crime During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Court Decision. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 291–307.

Purnomo, V. D., & Dewi, A. (2023). Review of the Disparity of Judges’ Decisions in Cases Narcotics Abuse. Indonesian Journal of Economic & Management Sciences, 1(3), 227–242.

Romdoni, M., Fathullah, F., Fatma, M., & Darwis, Z. (2023). Inconsistency in judges’ legal considerations addressing special narcotics crimes. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 188–194.

Setiawan, D. W., & Bawono, B. T. (2020). Disparity of Judge’s Decision on Children Of Narcotics Crime Actors Study on Denpasar State Court Decision No. 3/Pid. Sus. Anak/2014/PN. Dps. by Denpasar State Court Decision No. 14/Pid. Sus. Anak/2015/PN. Dps. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2(4), 579–584.

Sinambela, Y. P. (2020). Disparity of death penalthy decision against people criminal acts of dark circular narcotics. Asian Social Science and Humanities Research Journal (ASHREJ), 2(1), 9–19.

Singhal, A., Tien, Y.-Y., & Hsia, R. Y. (2016). Racial-ethnic disparities in opioid prescriptions at emergency department visits for conditions commonly associated with prescription drug abuse. PloS One, 11(8), e0159224.

Suhendar, S., Rezki, A., & Yunus, N. R. (2022). Legal Certainty in the Application of the Crime of Narcotics Abuse Judging from the Disparity of Judges’ Decisions. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 9(1), 121–132.

Tafe, E. J. (1993). Sentencing Drug Offenders in Federal Courts: Disparity and Disharmony. USFL Rev., 28, 369.

Ulmer, J., Light, M. T., & Kramer, J. (2011). The “liberation” of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: Is there increased disparity and divergence between courts? Justice Quarterly, 28(6), 799–837.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-30

How to Cite

Jumra. (2023). Decision Disparity in Narcotics Abuse. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 3(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v3i1.108

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): JISSR

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work while granting the journal the right of first publication. The published work is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). This license permits others to share and adapt the work, provided that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal as the initial publisher.
  2. Authors may establish separate, additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of their published work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or including it in a book), as long as they acknowledge its original publication in this journal.
  3. Authors must sign a copyright transfer agreement once they have reviewed and approved the final proof provided by JISSR before publication.