Why Safety Policies Fail in High-Risk Public Organizations: An Implementation Governance Perspective from the Power Generation Sector

Authors

  • A Jusriadi Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Andi Aslinda Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Rifdan Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Didin Hafid Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v5i2.250

Keywords:

policy, governance, occupational safety, organizations, generation sector, Indonesia

Abstract

The failure to implement occupational safety and health (OSH) policies remains a persistent problem in high-risk public organizations, even though a comprehensive regulatory framework and operational standards are in place. This article aims to analyze why OSH policies fail to be implemented effectively in high-risk public organizations using the perspective of implementation governance. This study uses a qualitative approach through case studies in the power generation sector, with data collection techniques in the form of in-depth interviews, observations, and policy document analysis. The analysis is based on a policy implementation framework that emphasizes the interaction between policy objectives, resources, organizational characteristics, implementer disposition, and communication patterns. The findings show that the failure of OSH policies is not solely due to weak individual compliance, but rather to the discontinuity of implementation governance at the operational level. This study contributes to the enrichment of the policy implementation literature by repositioning OSH as a matter of public organization governance, not merely regulatory compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borys, D., Else, D., & Leggett, S. (2009). The safety management puzzle: Connecting the board and the ward. Safety Science Monitor, 13(1), 1–11.

Cooper, M. D. (2018). Strategic Safety Management: An Integrated Approach. CRC Press.

Dekker, S. (2014). The Safety Anarchist: Relying on Human Expertise and Innovation, Reducing Bureaucracy and Compliance. Routledge.

Denzin, N. K. (2012). The Qualitative Landscape. Sage.

Guldenmund, F. W. (2010). Understanding and Exploring Safety Culture. Delft University of Technology.

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance (3rd ed.). Sage.

Hopkins, A. (2012). Disastrous Decisions: The Human and Organisational Causes of the Gulf of Mexico Blowout. CCH Australia.

Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2016). Understanding Public Policy Implementation. Policy Press.

International Labor Organization (ILO). (2019). Safety and Health at the Heart of the Future of Work: Building on 100 Years of Experience. ILO.

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.

Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Management. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland (3rd ed.). University of California Press.

Reason, J. (2016). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Routledge.

Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.

Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the Unexpected: Sustained Performance in a Complex World (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

A Jusriadi, Andi Aslinda, Rifdan, & Didin Hafid. (2025). Why Safety Policies Fail in High-Risk Public Organizations: An Implementation Governance Perspective from the Power Generation Sector. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 5(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v5i2.250

Issue

Section

Articles